From albury@peg.apc.org
Wed Oct 25 08:23:05 1995
Reply to: sewer-list@mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: From: Albury City Council, Australia

The following is the text of a paper delivered to a water management conference in Florida on 24 Oct 95 by the Manager, Design Services, Albury City Council, Australia.
All enquiries regarding this paper should be emailed to albury@peg.pegasus.oz.au with the Subject:"Attn Daryl McGregor"

Howard Lowndes -- Computer Administrator
================================================================
	DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTI-FACETED WASTEWATER
	MANAGEMENT SCHEME FOR A REGIONAL CITY IN AUSTRALIA

	Daryl McGregor, Manager Design Services Albury City Council

	Albury City Council, 553 Kiewa Street
	Albury, New South Wales, Australia

ABSTRACT
Albury, a regional city in Australia with a population of 42,000 people, has developed and is proceeding with an integrated wastewater treatment, water reclamation and reuse project. A range of urban housekeeping initiatives are also being implemented under an all embracing philosophy of "Co-operating for a Cleaner River" - the river being the Murray River, Australia's most important water resource.

The Water Reclamation Project involves :- construction in stages, of a new activated sludge treatment facility (8 ML/d initially; 30 ML/d ultimately), incorporating biological/chemical nutrient removal, provision for sand filtration and UV disinfection. reuse of reclaimed water via re-established wetlands and irrigation of 375 hectares of riverine and commercial woodlots and 6 hectares of local recreation areas.

The total scheme cost is estimated at A$35 million for Stage 1 and A$57.5 million for the ultimate development.

Complementary initiatives include:- expansion of user pays water rates to reflect the true cost of the resource. maintenance of stringent trade waste policies to minimise discharge of heavy metals and other toxic compounds to the sewerage system. ongoing sewer rehabilitation programmes to minimise stormwater ingress. construction of urban stormwater runoff sedimentation basins, retarding basins and water quality control ponds. encouraging the use of dual flush toilets and low flow shower nozzles in all new buildings. improved phosphorus removal facilities and implementation of a community based phosphorus awareness and reduction campaign.

KEYWORDS:- wastewater, treatment, beneficial re-use, reclaimed water, phosphorus removal, nutrients, wetlands, woodlots, biological nutrient removal, stormwater.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Australia is a dry land continent. On average, the rainfall in this country is only 66% of that for Africa, 64% of that for North America and 61% of that for Europe. With a very high evaporation rate and the lowest runoff rate of any continent, Australia really is a water deficient country. (Refer Table 1)

The total discharge from ALL Australian rivers is about the same as that for the St Lawrence (Canada) and about half of that for the Amazon. In the Murray Darling Basin, where Albury is located, the total discharge is about 10% of the Danube.

Continent
Rainfall (millimetres)
Runoff (millimetres)
Runoff as a Percentage of rainfall

South America
1350
480
36
Africa
710
180
25
North America
660
250
38
Asia
640
200
31
Europe
610
230
38
Australia
420
50
12

TABLE 1:  AVERAGE RAINFALL AND RUNOFF OF THE CONTINENTS

SOURCE:	Water and the Natural Resources Water Resources Commission, Australia

The Murray Darling Basin occupies 14% of the total land area of Australia. It supports about 1.8 million people and contains 42% of all Australian farms. The Basin contains half our crop land, half our sheep population, half our orchards and a quarter of our cattle. (Refer Table 2). Of all Australia's irrigated crops and pastures, 75% are within the Basin. It is of obvious importance to our on-going wealth, welfare and prosperity.

AREA	1,058,800 square kilometres or 106 million hectares
	Equivalent to 14% of total area of Australia
RIVERS	3 Main Groups
	Darling River and Tributaries
	Murrumbidgee River and Tributaries
	The Murray River and Tributaries
FARMING	Basin contains 42% of all Australian Farms
	Includes:
	-	= Australia's crop land
	-	= our sheep population
	-	= our orchards
	-	< our cattle
	-	> our irrigated crops and pastures
POPULATION    1.8 million people

The Basin is obviously important to Australia's on-going welfare, wealth and prosperity.

TABLE 2:  THE MURRAY DARLING BASIN:  A FEW FACTS
SOURCE:  Murray Darling Basin Commission

It is now becoming apparent that our ability to significantly expand water use in all valleys is limited. This is particularly the case in the Murray Darling Basin and must be viewed, with concern, as a constraint to future development and sustainability.

Only recently, and largely as a result of a disastrous blue-green algae outbreak along 1,000 kilometres of the Darling River in 1991-'92, have we begun to realise how precious our water really is and how vulnerable we are to a lack of supply.

2.0 BACKGROUND

Albury is an Australian regional city with a population of 42,000 people, located approximately 600 kms south west of Sydney. It is strategically and sensitively situated at the top end of Australia's most important river, the Murray; and communities along the 2,400 km length of the River, to Goolwa in South Australia, have a very keen interest in how Albury treats its wastewater.

Currently, Albury City Council is proceeding with a strategy to develop the most sophisticated, integrated wastewater treatment and water reclamation project in inland Australia. A range of urban housekeeping strategies are also being implemented under an all embracing philosophy of "Co-operating for a Cleaner River".

The aspects of the strategy which will be developed in this paper include:- nutrient control philosophies, including development of a biological process for phosphorus removal. the City's overall wastewater management strategy. employment of complementary initiatives, including measures for source minimisation, particularly of phosphorus. stormwater management objectives and initiatives. future developments.

3.0 BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL PROCESSES

Much attention has been directed towards nutrient discharges to rivers in Australia in recent years. This concentrated attention has proven to be warranted, given the much publicised outbreak of blue-green algae over a 1,000 km stretch of the Darling River, over the summer of 1991/92. The issue in Australia has been somewhat clouded by the widely held view that "land disposal" of sewage, or sewage effluent, is the most desirable way to solve wastewater management problems, particularly those relating to nutrient concentrations.

However, this solution, as a universal panacea, has not been fully evaluated in a number of aspects, including:- consideration of the real value of reclaimed water as a resource. potential for detrimental impacts of land disposal schemes, including overland discharges, uncontrolled discharges to groundwaters, potential impacts associated with elevating water tables etc. potential for long term irreversible environmental damage. difficulties in monitoring and controlling such schemes.

Since 1919, Albury has discharged its treated water to the Murray River. The City entered the arena of biological nutrient removal in 1987 with the conversion of an existing intermittent cycle extended aeration activated sludge plant to a continuously aerated, three stage BNR process. Over the eight years of operation this plant has averaged 76% removal of total phosphorus and 64% total nitrogen removal.
Influent and effluent analysis results for the plant are summarised in Table 3 below.

Sept '87 to Oct '88
Nov '88 to Jul '91
From Aug '91

Parameter
Average
No. of
Samples
Average
No. of
Samples
Average
No. of
Samples


INFLUENT
Flow
11 ML/d
-
13.5 ML/d
-
14.2 ML/d
-
COD
472
65
578
122
486
95
SS
247
46
244
128
260
63
pH
7.2 units
51
6.7 units
128
7.3
64
TKN
39
16
38
24
41
21
NH3-N
29
52
26
121
26
60
Ortho-P
6.2
65
6.5
125
-
-
Total-P
9.4
28
9.4
67
8.4
40

EFFLUENT

COD
38.2
73
55
58
-
-
SS
11.4
45
15.1
133
18.1
104
TKN
8.2
20
16.1
52
18
4
NH3-N
6.1
99
11.7
129
12.1
105
NO3-N
1.1
74
0.3
109
0.25
14
Ortho-P
2.7
97
1.2
137
-
-
Total-P
3.3
33
1.7
66
2.1
105

1.  All units in mg/L unless shown otherwise
2.  All samples are 24 hour composites

4.0 ALBURY'S FUTURE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

4.1 Selected Option
The strategy developed for the future management of the City's wastewater combines the highest standard of purification possible with a philosophy to optimise the beneficial re-use of the resultant reclaimed water. The beneficial re-use options (which were selected after an extensive public consultation process along the whole 2,400 km length of the River), provide in-built safeguards in the form of additional treatment modules - namely wetlands and summer irrigation of woodlots.

The selected option, shown schematically in Figure 1, involves:- construction in stages of a new activated sludge treatment plant (8 ML/d initially; 30 ML/d ultimately) incorporating biological and chemical removal of nutrients with provision for addition of sand filtration if subsequently found necessary. (Initial aim of 1 mg/L effluent phosphorus concentration, reducing to 0.5 mg/L never to be exceeded; 0.3 mg/L as a 90 percentile). retention of the existing Activated Sludge Plant (12 ML/d) augmented by chemical nutrient removal, again with provision for addition of sand filtration if found necessary. development of woodlot irrigation for summer utilisation of reclaimed water (involving 375 hectares of land). development of irrigation schemes for local recreation areas (involving 6 hectares of land). construction, initially, of 35 hectares of wetlands to serve as enhanced treatment modules providing a suitable aquatic system and environment for the re-establishment of wetland plant species and providing habitat for water based colonies. The Estimated Capital Cost to implement Stage 1 of the Strategy is $35.22 million with Annual Costs (in year 2000) of $3.29 million. The ultimate scheme development (involving construction of a further two stages in 2010 and 2019) will cost approximately $57.5 million (based on 1993 prices).

[By way of comparison, the option involving best available technology for high standard wastewater treatment, with continued discharge of the reclaimed water to the Murray River would have a Stage 1 Capital Cost of $28.14 million (Annual Cost $2.91 million) and an ultimate cost of $48.6 million.]

4.2 Objectives of Scheme
The objectives of the Water Reclamation and Reuse Project are to:- provide wastewater management facilities capable of securing the future growth and economic development of Albury well into the next century. provide an improvement in Murray River water quality that will not be eroded as the population grows. replace essential infrastructure that has reached the end of its service life. ultimately relocate all sewage treatment facilities to a site where adequate buffer zones can be maintained with no risk of urban encroachment. contribute to the conservation and enhancement of the environment of the Murray River floodplain by re establishing and providing the resources to actively manage riverine wetlands and floodplain forests. enable the recurrent operating costs of the project to be offset to some extent by sustainable production of timber and associated products.

The new plant at Nursery Valley will incorporate advanced sewage treatment technology including biological and chemical nutrient removal and ultra-violet disinfection; resulting in a much higher standard of treatment than is currently provided. The EPA licensed discharge point will be at the outlet from the plant and prior to any reuse. The water quality standard required at the licensed discharge point will be such that no deleterious impact will be caused even if discharged to environmentally sensitive waters. Council believes that this is the responsible level of pre-treatment for any land or water based reuse of reclaimed water.

4.3 Proposed Beneficial Re-uses of Reclaimed Water
As outlined above, the water reclaimed by the treatment plant(s) will be utilised for local beneficial reuse. The reuses proposed are:- the rehabilitation and expansion of degraded riverine wetlands on the floodplain, ultimately 80 ha in area. the establishment of 86 ha of irrigated commercial woodlots at Nursery Valley. the establishment of 26 ha of irrigated commercial woodlots in West Albury around the existing Kremur Street Treatment Works. the progressive establishment of an irrigated River Red Gum floodplain forest adjacent to and complementing the wetlands. Ultimately 263 ha in area. irrigation of 6 ha of playing fields in West Albury.

Additional benefits that will flow from the implementation of the project will include:- the re establishment of riparian zones along all the streams, drainage lines and water bodies within the project area. the establishment of wildlife corridors linking Nursery Valley and the Nail Can Hill area to the River. extensive non-harvestable screen plantings around the publicly accessible boundaries of the woodlot areas. re-vegetation of a significant proportion of Nursery Valley that has been previously cleared and has a high erosion risk potential. the establishment and progressive development of a wetlands amenities park providing access to wetlands, boardwalks, bird hides and interpretative trails. the ultimate incorporation of the wetlands, suitable re-vegetation areas and the floodplain forests into the Albury-Wodonga Regional Parklands.

In order to deliver the Design and Documentation of the Project (with a budget of A$2.4 million), Council has entered into a joint venture arrangement with the NSW Public Works Department with the author designated as the Project Manager.

4.4 Wetlands Proposal
The primary objectives in developing the wetlands proposal are:- to provide a beneficial reuse of the reclaimed water by establishing an ecological resource for the region with development primarily for conservation purposes whilst affording educational and controlled recreational opportunities. to maximise water purification by utilising the natural abilities of wetlands to filter pollutants. to provide a measure of system backup as a buffer against unforeseen treatment plant operational difficulties. to enable monitoring and assessment of the treatment effectiveness (and efficiency) of wetlands, particularly with respect to receipt of highly treated reclaimed water. The operational objective of the wetlands will be to manage the hydrological regime of the system to emulate the pattern which would have occurred in the past, prior to river regulation; that is winter-spring flooding followed by a gradual lowering of the water over the summer-autumn. The lowering of the wetlands will be achieved by using the water for irrigation of woodlots and recreation areas.

4.5 Irrigated Woodlots Proposal
The aim of the woodlot/recreation area irrigation schemes is to not only maximise the beneficial reuse of the reclaimed water, but also to minimise, in total load terms, the ultimate discharge of nutrients to the river. Therefore, it is proposed to direct water from the wetlands for summer irrigation of approximately 6 hectares of recreation areas and up to 375 hectares of opportunity woodlots. Irrigation with highly treated effluent/reclaimed water will, to a large extent, address concerns about phosphorus accumulations in the soil profile of irrigation areas. Based on Stage 1 design flows of 20 ML/d (ADWF) approximately 40% of the reclaimed water can be effectively utilised on the areas identified based on balancing peak monthly, irrigation season, water supply demand with average dry weather flow.

5.0 COMPLEMENTARY STRATEGIES
Council is also implementing a range of complementary actions as part of its commitment to an on-going urban pollution reduction strategy. Actions to be continued or implemented include:- to continue stringent trade waste policies to ensure minimal heavy metals and other toxic compounds are accepted into the sewerage system. to continue sewer rehabilitation programmes to minimise stormwater ingress. to continue construction of urban stormwater runoff sedimentation basins, retarding basins and water quality control ponds. to encourage the use of dual flush toilets and low flow shower nozzles in all new buildings. operation of alum dosing facilities on the activated sludge section of the existing Sewage Treatment Plant to further improve phosphorus removal. (Implemented in 1994) the development of a community awareness programme aimed at reducing the discharge of phosphorus from all sources in the urban environment, with particular emphasis on encouraging the use of phosphorus free detergents.

6.0 THE PHOSPHORUS AWARENESS AND REDUCTION CAMPAIGN

6.1 General
A major initiative has been the development of a Phosphorus Awareness and Reduction Campaign. The campaign was launched in 1993 with the joint aims of increasing community awareness about the sources and impacts of phosphates and the measures that can be taken at a local level to reduce the amount of phosphorus in the urban environment.

From a treatment point of view the aim is to minimise the amount of phosphorus in the raw sewage (emanating from detergents) with the aims of:- minimising the cost of chemical addition to achieve required effluent phosphorus levels. providing a better balance between influent COD, Ammonia, TKN and total-P such that the biological removal processes are optimised.

The campaign has involved the preparation of a promotional video, regular Newsletters, a campaign poster, static displays, a schools programme, a guest speaker programme to community groups and service clubs and a direct mail brochure to every household in Albury-Wodonga. Television and other media commercials have been an important aspect of this intensive on-going campaign.

The program developed in Albury has now been adopted as a model for similar campaigns across New South Wales and ultimately it is hoped that a national campaign will ensue.

6.2 Campaign Monitoring
Two methodologies were adopted to measure and monitor the programme's performance:- i) Laboratory Analyses and the "Phos-Watch" Graph Phosphorus inputs to the Albury Sewage Treatment Works were measured on a daily basis and compared with pre-campaign levels. The results were graphed as weekly averages and published (weekly) in the local press and included in the weather forecast on local television. The levels were also included in local radio news bulletins. A copy of the "Phos-Watch" graph from October 1993 to June 1995 is reproduced in Figure 2. The graph indicates that the campaign has been very successful. From a pre-campaign level of 150 kgs of phosphorus per day, the level dropped to a low of 108 kg/day, but stabilised at around 120 kg/day. This represents a 20-28% reduction in the amount of phosphorus emanating from laundry detergents.

Laboratory analyses of all known detergents were also carried out by Council's Laboratory Staff and this information was reproduced in a leaflet which was sent to every residence in Albury-Wodonga in March last year. These detergent lists have now also been used (to provide consumer information) by a number of other organisations throughout Australia.

ii) Market Research
A Melbourne based research company, Boston Partners, was engaged to carry out questionnaire surveys and measure the success of the campaign. Three rounds of market research were carried out; in November 1993, May 1994 and November 1994. The results of this research are reproduced below:-

Nov. '93	May. '94	Nov. '94
Awareness of link Between Phosphorus and blue green algae
less than 10%		  96%		  94%
Changed Detergent Brands as result of Campaign
-		  21%		  31%
Doing Something different as result of Campaign
-		   -		  50%
Using phosphorus free laundry Powders
-		  25%		  28%
Using low phosphorus (less than 5%) Powders
-		  41%		  49%
Using high (greater than 5%) content Powders
-		  36%		  30%
Wash Cars on lawn
-		  45%		  52%
Care in Fertiliser Use
-		  10%		  14%
Preventing Run-off of Manure
-		  10%		  14%
Preventing organic matter from entering drains
-		  17%		  22%
Av. number of washing loads per week
-		  6.3		  5.4

The change in detergent use patterns verifies the "Phos-Watch" results. It is also pleasing that the Campaign has had a positive impact in all key reduction areas. By any measure, the Campaign has been very successful, probably, the most successful campaign of its type ever carried out in Australia.

7.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT INITIATIVES

Council also has in place a number of initiatives aimed at reducing the pollutant load to the Murray River from stormwater drainage. Within the context of an urban environment it is not always easy to dedicate sufficient land area for the construction of main drain treatment facilities. It must also be remembered that the primary function of drainage facilities is to prevent flooding and unfortunately, many of the strategies designed to intercept and treat stormwater have the potential to exacerbate flooding problems. Council has developed a number of schemes aimed at intercepting gross pollutants, silt and sand, including installation of trash racks, construction of gross pollutant retarding basins, and the utilisation of wetlands to intercept and treat the "first flush" discharge. On Albury's main drain, Bungambrawatha Creek, the following works have been (or are being) built:- sedimentation, gross pollutant and retarding basins on headwater catchments. gross pollutant screens. a major sedimentation and gross pollutant trap just upstream of the discharge point to the River. This facility is designed to trap sand, silt and other sediments, as well as trash, with discharge over a wide, grassed swale to the river. Major pollutants, including nutrients are expected to be trapped at this facility, particularly during the first flush of major storms; and a monitoring program is currently underway to test the efficiency of this facility.

On Eight Mile Creek, the Albury-Wodonga Development Corporation has in the past, built a number of retarding basins. Council in partnership with the Corporation has recently completed a major pollution control project at the discharge end of the Creek. The works will enable the first flush of major storms to be diverted to an existing wetlands on the flood plain of the Murray River. It is anticipated that this facility will significantly decrease the amount of nutrients, particularly phosphorus, in discharges to the river. The nutrient load in the drainage discharge will be absorbed and utilised by the wetlands.

South Albury drainage to Mudges Canal is directed to a large sedimentation basin, Brown's Lagoon. This lagoon is currently being expanded in volume with development of another basin just down stream. Brown's Lagoon is extremely efficient in collecting sediment in the stormwater and hence significantly reduces the nutrient load on the River. Trash and other gross pollutants are prevented from reaching the River at the Levee Bank Pump Facility.

A further wetlands facility is planned for Mungabareena Reserve to treat stormwater from another major drain, the Lavington Outfall.

8.0 FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

It is difficult to predict the future politics of effluent disposal/reclaimed water re-use in Australia. However, the core of Albury's strategy is to develop treatment facilities which will produce a high quality reclaimed water, such that re-use options are maximised into the future. It may very well be that to enable future development of downstream cities, towns, industries and irrigation projects, the most beneficial re-use of Albury's reclaimed water will be to fully return it to the River for the downstream users. Water is a valuable resource in this country and is in short, and decreasing, supply.

9.0 SUMMARY

The City of Albury has developed what it believes to be a comprehensive, integrated approach to wastewater management. The strategy which looks ahead to the year 2040 has, as its underlying philosophy, the production of high quality reclaimed water, such that re-use opportunities can be maximised.

The elements of this future strategy, planned for implementation in stages from 1998, include:- development of new, high technology treatment facilities incorporating combined biological/chemical removal of nutrients with provision for the addition of sand filtration, if subsequently required. development of woodlot irrigation areas on the floodplain of the Murray River. development of irrigation schemes for recreation areas. utilisation of wetlands for final polishing and to establish an ecological resource for the region. commitment to a range of complementary, wastewater management issues including urban stormwater treatment and source minimisation of pollutants, particularly phosphorus.

10.0 REFERENCES

Albury City Council/NSW Public Works Department (1992). Water Recycling Options for Albury, Technical Reports.
Booth Associates (1994) Albury City Council Water Reclamation Project, Soil survey and land capability assessment. (Unpublished).
Boston Partners (1993, 1994), Market Research Surveys - Albury-Wodonga Phosphorus Awareness and Reduction Campaign. (Unpublished).
Coffey Partners International Pty Ltd (1993), Albury Water Reclamation Project - hydrogeological studies Report G358/1-AB. (Unpublished).
Klomp, N.I. and Hull, S. (1994) Water reclamation and recycling project - Flora and Fauna Study, Charles Sturt University. (Unpublished).
McGregor, D.L. (1989). Biological removal of phosphorus at an augmented activated sludge plant, 5th National Local Government Engineers Conference, Sydney.
McGregor, D.L. (1990). Experiences in nutrient removal at a full-scale activated sludge plant at Albury, 1st Australian Conference on Biological Nutrient Removal, Bendigo.
Pressey, R.L. 1986. Wetlands of the River Murray below Lake Hume, River Murray Comm. Env. Rep. 86/1.
U.S. EPA (1988). Design Manual, Constructed Wetlands and Aquatic Plant Species for Municipal Wastewater Treatment, EPA/625/1-88, 022.
Water Pollution Control Federation (1990); Natural Systems for Wastewater Treatment, MOP FD-16.